Free yoga classes at the University of Ottawa were cancelled by the Student Federation because of “concerns over cultural misappropriation.” The weekly classes had been going on since 2008. That is until the Student Federation decided that now was the time “we needed to be mindful of how we express ourselves while practicing yoga” because “cultures have experienced oppression, cultural genocide and diasporas due to colonialism and Western supremacy.” 

The Student Federation's tagline is "educate, agitate, organize." WTF? And these people feel Westerners should be more thoughtful of how we practice yoga. They might want to be more thoughtful on their mandate (and they might want to chill out a little. I hear yoga is good for that ...). But the Student Federation has a right to their feelings. We all do. In fact, it’s law. The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms states that our “fundamental freedoms” include:

·      Freedom of conscience
·      Freedom of religion
·      Freedom of thought
·      Freedom of belief
·      Freedom of expression
·      Freedom of the press
·      Freedom of peaceful assembly
·      Freedom of association

That means we can think and say what we believe (with clauses against hate speech and obscenity). I can like yoga. I can hate yoga. I can, and do, ignore yoga. You can love it or hate it, too. But neither one of us can cancel classes because of how we feel. Because you know what’s not included in our fundamental freedoms? The freedom to censor. We don’t have that. And we shouldn’t.

Bah – does it matter, Shannon, if they cancel some yoga classes? Yes. It matters. Cancelling yoga classes because it offends a small group of people is the same as banning books for the same reason. No yoga today and no J.D. Salinger tomorrow. Too big of a leap for you? Not convinced (even though history proves me right)?

Microaggressions = macro-offenses?
Read about two new terms, “microaggressions” and “trigger warnings” in this excerpt from The Coddling of the American Mind:

Two terms have risen quickly from obscurity into common campus parlance. Microaggressions are small actions or word choices that are thought of as a kind of violence. For example, it is a microaggression to ask an Asian American “where were you born?” because this implies that he or she is not a real American.

Trigger warnings are alerts professors are expected to issue if something in a course might cause a strong emotional response. For example, some students have called for warnings that Chinua Achebe’s Things Fall Apart describes racial violence and that F. Scott Fitzgerald’s The Great Gatsby portrays misogyny and physical abuse, so students who have been previously victimized by racism or domestic violence can choose to avoid these works, which they believe might trigger a recurrence of past trauma.”

Oh, Shannon – that’s just a few hyper-sensitive kids. Nope. From the same article:

“This new climate is slowly being institutionalized, and is affecting what can be said in the classroom, even as a basis for discussion. During the 2014–15 school year, for instance, the deans and department chairs at the 10 University of California system schools were presented by administrators at faculty leader-training sessions with examples of microaggressions. The list of offensive statements included: “America is the land of opportunity” and “I believe the most qualified person should get the job.””

Fundamental freedoms for me; not for you
These few hyper-sensitive kids matter. Cancelling yoga classes matters. And when new vernacular is introduced that impacts decision-making about university-level learning, it matters.

We’ve over oscillated. We’re on the extreme left, which is just as dangerous as the extreme right. If we don’t allow people and cultures and ideas to be tested because we can’t discuss our differences or similarities, if we can’t have meaningful conversation, how will we learn anything?

For example, if instead of cancelling the yoga classes, the Student Federation hosted a discussion forum about how to be mindful when we practice yoga, we might have learned that, in Hindi, yoga means “to join,” a lovely sentiment applied to joining the spiritual and physical world but also joining people. We might have also learned that we have the right to feel as we wish about yoga, but we do not have the right to cancel yoga classes based on our feelings. That’s censorship, and we don’t have that right. Maybe someone should teach this course in university …


The One



The One. You know, the big fat hairy One who we’re all waiting for, The One who makes it all make sense, The One who quells our fears, The One who rights our wrongs, The One who brightens our days, The One who saves us from the doldrum of singledom so that we can sit with The One at the end of our lives on a porch swing staring contentedly into a sunset while some meandering, meaningful music plays softly in the background. The carrot at the end of our proverbial romantic sticks.

We’re inundated with the concept of The One. Books, movies, pop songs barrage us with the idea. Pop songs tell us The One will live and die for us, steal the sun from the sky for us (thanks Bon Jovi). Movies tell us The One will travel the globe to find us. Books tell us we met The One but (insert conflict here) we then wasted 20 years on a bunch of not The Ones before finding The One again. Because there is only one The One, obviously.

And it’s this drama – the drama of The One – that ruins romance for us. It makes us sad. It makes us sad to look and not find and it makes us sad to look, find and then realize there’s no such thing as being saved by another person. Why do we need that drama? Why do we need to be saved? Why is The One never the partner you simply like talking to and canoodling with on the regular?

Where does the idea of The One even come from?
I suggest it comes from religion; it comes from monogamy. But the lustiness and romance of The One – the truly unrealistic teat society has been sucking on – comes from damsel-in-distress-style fairytales where The One fixes us. Two quick examples:

  • In Cinderella, the prince fixes our damsel’s living situation by searching high and low for her, his one criteria that her foot fit perfectly into a glass slipper. 
  • In Snow White, our damsel is fixed with a kiss from her one true love (and they both sing songs about meeting each other and the forever and oneness of it all).

Somehow we’ve turned these fairytales into a real life goal. We think that our prince is going to come along. We still think there’s a princess out there who is the perfect fit. Fairytales have become our dogma for love. If we’ve allowed religious literature to tell us how to be good (and I suggest we shouldn’t), we’ve also allowed fairytales to tell us how to find The One and “live happily ever after.” Unlike the lofty Ten Commandments, there are only three commandments to finding The One:

  • Though shalt find someone who completes you.
  • Though shalt find someone who completes only you.
  • Though shalt find someone who completes only you forever.

That’s unrealistic. How exactly does a person complete you? And contrary to fairytales, to be complete in modern times we need more than to be rescued from our chores or to wake up. It seems we need The One to end our loneliness, fear, insecurity, sleepless nights, dreary days. We need to be saved. That’s what the perfect prince or princess does, right?

A little realism
Kyle Kinane has this comedy bit where he suggests we can have miracles all the time if we just lower our standards of what a miracle can be. It’s a story about laundry. And while it is hilarious, I think we can learn a little something here – we might need to loosen up our definition of The One.

Maybe The One doesn’t have to solve all of our problems? Maybe we can have more than one The One? Maybe we can aim for serial monogamy with a bunch of The Ones? Or a polyamourous situation with a few great The Ones?

I’m not trying to be facetious here. And I’m not suggesting that we lower our standards. I’m not advocating for anti-love. I’m not bitter. Or disillusioned. I love the love. I think looking for love and finding love is amazing. But I am trying to broaden the definition of The One because I feel it’s so constricting that it simply sets us up for failure and sadness because we’re looking for something unattainable.

For starters, how hard is it to find The One if there is only one The One? Hard. Needle in a haystack hard. One in 7.3 billion hard. We search and find, and go through the ups and downs. We’ve found a keeper, but then maybe we haven’t. The shoe never quite fits. The prince never arrives. It’s devastating. Tears are shed. Shitty books called The Rules are read. Prozac is prescribed. And despite feeling sad that we’re still alone, still unsaved, we remain committed to the dogma of finding The One who will solve all of our problems.

Chicken or the sadness?
Rob Gordon, our feckless leading man in High Fidelity, opens the film with a great monologue about how pop songs may have ruined his ability to be happy: "what came first, the music or the misery? People worry about kids playing with guns, or watching violent videos, that some sort of culture of violence will take them over. Nobody worries about kids listening to thousands, literally thousands of songs about heartbreak, rejection, pain, misery and loss. Did I listen to pop music because I was miserable? Or was I miserable because I listened to pop music?"

So, I ask: Are we sad because we can’t find The One or are we looking for The One because we’re sad? And if we find a potential The One, and they don’t live up to our expectations, because how could one person possibly fix all of our problems – are we wrong because they weren’t really The One or are we wrong because we’re on the quest to find The One at all?

Co-brain credit: Shayn Yoe who, over cheese and wine, talked with me for a few hours about The One, helping to define ideas and discover new ones. Thanks Shayn! 

We like to be certain about things, don’t we? We like to know. Of course we do. That’s why we’re so certain about our jobs and our relationships. And life. Right? Right.

I’m uncomfortable even typing that. I’m not certain. I don’t know what’s going to happen in the future. My story is not fully written yet (FYI: I hope it’s an epic dramedy). You’re probably uncertain. Your story is not fully written yet. And I think that’s great. (If you are certain, I call bullshit.)

Let’s talk about work.
I recently went to a leadership talk given by Liz Wiseman and her surprising, yet welcome theme was this – we’re all winging it at work. She is winging it. You are winging it. I am winging it.

Liz teaches leadership to global executives – Apple, Disney, Nike, Google. She’s listed as one of the top 10 leadership thinkers in the world and, in her spare time, she wrote three best-selling books.

And she thinks we’re all winging it. Scary, right? How can that be when we’re taught to have the answers and are reprimanded when we don’t? How can that be when our intelligence and ability is evaluated based on our knowing how to do things?

So how does winging it fit in? It doesn’t. So we hide it. We hide that we don’t know.

What about love?
Just as we’re expected to know in business, we’re expected to know in love. But do we? Can we? I’m not sure. Love is a big part of our unwritten story.

In Helen Fisher’s TEDtalk about love, she explains that “millions of years ago, we evolved three brain drives: lust, romantic love and attachment.” We know that. We call it monogamy. But we’re also hardwired to “feel deep attachment to a long-term partner while you feel intense romantic love for somebody else, while you feel the sex drive for people unrelated to these other partners.”

Scary, right? I mean we’ve totally bought into monogamy and soul mates and marriage and forever plot. So how does loving multiple people at the same time fit in with soul mates? How does promising monogamy forever – knowing until death do you part – fit in? It doesn’t. So we hide it. We hide that we don’t know.

Let’s talk about not knowing.
If we’re all winging it, why are we all hiding it? I don’t know. I suspect we’re afraid of failure and of being alone and that leads us to fake it until we make it a lot. But that’s a big topic for a different article.

In the meantime, let’s just admit that we’re not sure. Let’s talk about it. Openly. Without judgment. Let’s confess at work and at home that we don’t know. And let’s figure out the ending together.

That’s winging it. And winging it makes life challenging and exciting. It’s okay to not know. There is a freedom in not knowing the outcome, but finding out. A freedom in not knowing about forever, but allowing your relationship to grow and fit in different ways. A freedom in fucking up and learning and doing it all again. That’s life. It’s messy and imperfect. And it’s great. That’s our story. 

Our inner child. Our joyous little version of ourselves tucked inside our grown-up bodies. Our wee gnomes of delight that, like a pimple, we can pop and the bliss will ooze out of us and save us from the drudgery of paying bills. 

Oh, wee one, show yourself and let me be as happy as a child once again! 

Or at least, if you Google "inner child," that’s what many (many many many) articles, quotes and people will have us believe. They will say, to experience joy and happiness again, we need to search for our inner child and relive the purity, joy and innocence we felt as children, and they suggest we do so by:

  • Skipping into a field of wild flowers with the sun beaming down on us 
  • Journeying into our deepest memories to uncover our first moment of childhood joy 
  • Reliving the time we ran into the ocean with our arms outstretched leaping into the waves and laughing 

But what they fail to understand is that the pop-psychology concept is not meant for the average person nostalgic for a more carefree time in their lives. It’s used to heal “unresolved childhood experiences and the lingering dysfunctional effects of childhood dysfunction.” 

Not so much to learn to giggle again, people, but rather to get past serious trauma. 

So where do these carefree inner child images come from? Why are they part of our collective consciousness? Movies. Advertising. Books. And other fiction. It’s pretend. It’s someone else’s imagination. Someone else’s version of what happy looks like. And they are willing to sell you that image.

But here's the real question: why do we buy it? 

Maybe because it's lovely. The image of the inner child currently in circulation is indeed a happy one (never the barfy jerks that kids can be sometimes). And partially because it sounds easy. To be happy all we have to do is relive a happy memory from our childhood, which hits us right in our nostalgic sweet spots. There's no real work involved. There's no reflecting on your present or trying to determine, if you are unhappy, why. It seems to be just about reliving the past, and only the good parts of our past. 

Is that what true happiness is? I'm not convinced. So I will end with a letter filled with anger and sarcasm (which, incidentally, makes me happy):

Dear counselors-in-training, happiness bloggers and self-help-book-bingers,

I’m sure you mean well, but please fuck off. I don’t need to act like a goddamn five-year-old to be happy. I don’t need my happiness to be infantilized, thank you very much. When I express joy, I am not releasing my inner-fucking-child. I’m just happy. As an adult. In the present. Try it! 

Love Shannon.

I’ve come to terms with our relationship, pharmacy beauty aisle. You lie. I believe(ish). You are a brightly-lit place filled with false hope, and your aspirational products sway my wee ego into shelling out for crap that doesn’t work and sometimes makes things worse (thanks again home perm product. I totally wanted hay for hair. You nailed it!). 

I get that I play a pivotal role in our relationship – codependency and all that – but we need to talk. The following products have let me down so many times that I have to call you out.

Cuticle cream
I can never get my cuticles to behave. I go to the nail salon and the manicurist deftly pushes my cuticles back with a little wooden stick and my cuticles are all like: “Oh. Back there? Right. Got it. No problem. Everyone, everyone – let’s just go back there.” And they do.

But when I try this at home my cuticles are all like: “What are you doing? You are using one half of a chopstick set, for crying out loud. We don’t respect you. Everyone, everyone – stay put. Stay put everyone. Actually move forward. Cover the whole nail bed. She is not a professional and cannot be trusted.”

Dear cuticles: The cuticle-dissolving cream at the pharmacy scares me, so you win. I will get my nails professionally done, but I’m going to the mean lady who mocks me for flinching when she stabs me. Love Shannon.

Dear cuticle-dissolving cream makers: Please call your product something less scary. How can I be sure it won’t dissolve the rest of my fingers? Think about it. Love Shannon.

It’s time to create an eyeliner for people who have gently used eyelids. Experienced eyelids, if you will. When you’re 20, you glide eyeliner across your smooth eyelid and a smooth line is left behind. Success!

At 41, you try to glide the eyeliner across your gently used eyelid, but there is very little gliding motion. The eyeliner works more like a tiny snowplow intent on pushing your eyelid skin into a ball in the middle of your eyelid and your lashes get mushed up in there and poke out at weird angles. It looks like a tiny ball sack, actually. Nobody wants to see that.

Dear eyeliner developers: Please develop a product that fixes my tiny ball sack issue as soon as possible. Maybe eyeliner stickers? Just an idea. Also, I don’t want to pay more than $12 for this amazing new product. Thanks! Love Shannon

You know I’m putting it on my face, right? So two things:
  1. Make foundation human-skin-coloured. I’m not buying four bottles of foundation and mixing them up to get the exact shade for my face. I’m not fucking Monet. I’m pouring some foundation from one bottle into my hands and applying it like moisturizer. 
  2. Make a foundation that doesn’t give me pimples. I don’t want to look moderately good for one night and then pimply and gross for four days. That’s not a good ratio of beauty to not beauty. 

Dear foundation makers: Try harder. Love Shannon.  

Who decided that we want our hair to smell like a beach? I would like to see that research. Did thousands of pharmacy-shopping people say things like “coconut. I only feel my hair is clean when I smell like coconuts. Mixed with Tahitian vanilla or exotic coral, specifically.” Alternately, your hair can smell like candied fruit. Totally up to you.

Dear shampoo producers: Instead of the tropics or a candy store, I would like to smell like success and effortless charm. Maybe use a musk of some sort? I don’t know. I’m not a scientist. Love Shannon.

In summary, dear pharmacy beauty aisle, I wish I could break up with you, but you know me too well to fall for that. I’ll come crawling back to sheepishly purchase some lash-lengthening or skin-brightening product. I need the high of the beauty lie, damn you!

Love/hate Shannon. 

‘Tis the season to go to parties. Everyone and their grandmother is hosting some sort of event and most of them will suck. Don’t go to those parties. Only go to the good ones. Duh. Here’s some more gold ...

Not going
If someone invites you to an event via email, and you are ignoring the invite because it sounds boring or it’s far or you have to bring an appie, and they harass you for not replying to their email, get huffy and say: “what? Is this 2001? I don’t check my email. Text me for crying out loud." Because so much time has likely passed, you can say you have other plans and they will apologize for being archaic. If someone invites you to an event to your face, and for sure you don’t want to go, say yes and then don’t show up.

Dear people throwing parties and asking people to bring their own food: Please stop. Why would I want to go to your house to eat my food? I have my food here already. See? It makes no sense.

Going, but not helping
If you don't want to help at dinner parties, just offer to help. Yell from the living room to the kitchen something like: “you need a hand in there?” No self-respecting dinner host will accept your offer.

Shutting up
Never tell people about the gross places your pet licks. For example, I am dictating this article right now while resting naked in bed. My cat just curled up on my chest and started cleaning his paws, which were on my boob and so he started cleaning my boob. He's super helpful that way. This is the kind of story you should not tell other people. It makes them feel uncomfortable.

Dear dog people: please never discuss how your dog eats your dirty underwear. Ever. This grosses me out and I let my cat lick my boob. See?

Keep talking
Do you tell a story about a particularly bad piece of advice you've been given. Everyone can relate to this. For example, tell the story of how your slutty aunt gave you the worst relationship advice ever when you were 16: "Shannon, if you ever want to keep a man, you have to take it in the ass." People love this kind of tale. It makes them feel better about their own family issues.

Yes. Do that. Your suspicions are correct: you are more fun when you drink.

Taking photos
Do that within reason. Do photobomb. Do not be a poser.

Getting out
Don’t go around hugging everyone and making plans to see them soon. Just leave. Do the Irish Fade like a respectable party goer (not to be mistaken with the Harlem Shuffle, though this would be an awesome exit). If you fear your host will be upset, talk to them beforehand about their abandonment issues.

The next day 
Send a thank you/I’m sorry text, depending on how the night went. Also, if you peed somewhere weird, go back in time and don’t do that.

Happy partying folks!

Dear person who called seagulls dirty birds,

I overheard you the other day, disgust dripping from your voice as you watched a seagull eat a French fry: “I hate seagulls. They’re dirty birds.”

We have been over-fishing, urbanizing and polluting their habitat for as long as we’ve been around. We discard our fast food on the ground and atop over-flowing garbage bins, leaving it to rot. And we have the balls to call the birds that pick at our litter dirty?

Seagulls aren’t dirty. We are. They’ve simply adapted to the food source readily available to them. They’re actually cleaning up after us (and to their own detriment).

I love seagulls. They are beautiful birds with mournful cries. They remind me of the sea, of boats clanking and of freedom.

On the other hand, people who litter and people who call seagulls dirty birds remind me that we are not taking responsibility for what we’re doing to our own planet.

So, dear person, don’t hate seagulls. Look at the source of the filth – humans! – before you start pointing fingers at the creatures that have to endure us.

Love Shannon.

I heard a story recently about a couple who married and then divorced six months later. Though they lived together, he bought their new home and she kept her previous home. They played it safe. They weren’t sure, and so they created a safety net that ultimately made the split logistically easy for them. 

Their story made me wonder if emotional safety nets are reasonable? And how do we best use them? The purpose of these nets is to create a safe place to land if we fall. Good examples might include:

  • Saving enough money to quit your job
  • Making sure you understand what you and your partner want out of life before committing for life
  • Nurturing relationships with family and friends who will support you when you succeed and when you fail

So, yes, it’s reasonable to create a safety net. They allow us to take chances because we feel safe knowing even if we fall, we have a soft place to land. 

But how do we know the difference between a good and a bad safety net? We’re so good at convincing ourselves that we’re making smart decisions, especially when we can back up our choices with a “better safe than sorry” mentality. We sometimes use safety nets like a blanket, wrapping ourselves inside safe and warm, tangled up in our own fear of falling. 

And by falling, we mean failing, right? For example, we might stay in a job or relationship that isn’t satisfying because we’ve convinced ourselves we can’t do better. We’re afraid that if we try, we’ll fail. 

That’s not a safety net. That’s not even playing it safe. It’s something much more destructive than just being afraid to fail – we are creating an environment that ensures we’ll fail before we even try. 

I’m more afraid of being safe than I am sorry, more afraid of not learning from my failures than I am of failing. I have a deep fear that when I’m old, I’ll look back on my life and think: “Meh.” 

We’ve all read some Internet version of the top five regrets of the dying from Bronnie Wares book. If you haven’t, the moral of this book is to live your life fully, and it hits me right in the gut each time I read it. 

So this is the question I ask myself when making a tough decision: “Will I regret it when I’m 92?” And the answer is almost always no. Of course I won’t know if I’m right for another 52 years, but at least it’ll be a good conversation. Or I’ll be dead. Either way I hope there’s wine. 

Oh, how we love to get our way, don’t we? We have all these self-imposed personal rules about the right way and the wrong way to get things done. And I’m not talking about the big stuff (murder, working on Wall Street, etc). I’m talking about inconsequential things like how to do dishes, respond to an RSVP, take a photo. 

Not like that, but like this. If we have decided that things should be a certain way – and let’s be honest, that way is our way – and those things turn out to be some other way, we pout, stomp our feet, and fight to get our way.  

What’s wrong with another way? Nothing. Nothing at all. It’s just not our way. 
I have two stories about this. 

We’ll call the first one dishes, my dad and who can sigh the loudest. So there I am doing the dishes at Dad’s place. My father, forever the supervisor, comes over and tells me I’m doing the dishes wrong.
  • Me: (Annoyed sigh.) What are you talking about? 
  • Him: (Sanctimonious sigh.) You should do the glasses first.
  • Me: (Smug sigh.) I hate doing the cutlery, so I get it out of the way.
  • Him: (Chiding sigh.) But that’s not the right way.
  • Me: (Super annoyed sigh.) Who cares? As long as they’re clean, it doesn’t matter. 
  • Him: (Super chiding sigh.) It does.
  • Me: (Whiney sigh.). Why?
  • Him: (Super sanctimonious sigh.) Because it’s the right way to do them. 
  • Me: (Defeated sigh.) I love you, but go away, Dad. 

(Side story! Sighing in my family is an art form. For example, the first sigh in the dialogue was rich with history, and meant “oh no, here we go again – what am I doing wrong now?” And he knew it, that’s why his sigh meant “for crying out loud – why do you have to argue with me? Just do the dishes properly.”) 

But I digress. We were talking about how my Dad was totally in the wrong, right? He was. But so was I. I could have easily changed my routine, but doing the cutlery first was my rule and I was sticking to it. 

Now, let’s call the second story OMG. I’ve turned into my father. So there I am, 15 years later, in my fourth or fifth year of marriage. I’m away on a business trip. I call home to see how my husband and step-son are doing. My step-son answers the phone and immediately tells me that they haven’t eaten any vegetables since I left and that the house is a mess. My husband gets on the phone and says there were green peppers on the pizza, but that the rest of the story is true. He adds: “It’s nice when you’re not here because we don’t have to follow all of your rules.” 

I was devastated. It’s nice when I’m not there? Ouch. But I also felt I deserved it because I did have a lot of rules and I was sanctimonious about them. I thought my way was right. I had turned into my father. I decided right then and there to knock that shit off. 

And I have struggled with it ever since. I watch people doing tasks and squirm from the effort to keep my opinion to myself. It is deep within me to point out what people are doing wrong. I grew up being told I was doing things wrong. I grew up surrounded by people who were right, even when they weren’t, and so it’s no surprise that I turned out the same way. But I don’t want to be that way. 

I don’t want to be so weighted by my own rules that I bury myself under them. I want to care that the dishes are clean, not how they got that way. I want to be open to new ideas and ways of doing things. I want to spend more time caring about the big things, not the little things. And I want the people around me to think it’s nice when I’m around, not when I’m away. 

I’ve read a bunch of articles on dating and relationships – from top 10 lists to carefully weighted research papers. The commonly cited reasons for why relationships fail? Lack of trust, reality, communication and commitment. 

That feels right. We’ve all experienced those relationship problems first or second-hand. 

But long before we’ve even bought into a relationship, we’ve spent time shopping around for the right partner and here’s the problem: 

We can be terrible, terrible shoppers.

Our insecurities and baggage lead us into making shitty selections from the shitty section of the shitty partner store. Over and over. And that's why many relationships fail. 

Example? You betcha! 

For a long time, I was attracted to jealous men because their possessiveness made me feel loved. But I also hated feeling controlled, and I didn’t fully understand the situation, so it never worked out. 

But because I was attracted to jealous men, I unknowingly narrowed my choices. Even if I chose the very best one, he was still going to be jealous and …

I was still choosing a shitty guy from the shitty guy section of the shitty partner store.

It’s dangerous when we don’t see the pattern for what it is – a clue to the real problem – because we see the pattern as reality and we condemn ourselves to repeat it. We’re all insecure in some way. We all have baggage. True. But we don’t have to keep repeating the same mistakes. 

It took me a while to figure out that I was the only common denominator in my failed relationships, that I was looking for jealous men, and not that all men were jealous. It took me even longer to figure out why I needed men to prove their love for me in this way. But I did. (Fucking YAY that day. Seriously.) 

It’s so easy to blame the other person, but …

That won't help. The answers aren't out there. They're inside. We need to look at ourselves. Which is scary, right? Because we have to accept our own flaws. 

But if we're at the point where we’re routinely making grand statements like "men/women are all cheaters! There are no good men/women left! Men/women never commit!" then we need to do the work. We need to ask why we keep choosing the same type rather than blindly blaming the other person. 

We have to face our insecurities. We have to unpack our baggage. And that sucks. But to paraphrase Edison: 

You've not failed. You've just found 10,000 ways that didn't work. 

Only when we've done the work will be able to see our choices for what they are – shitty. And then – after a lengthy road to being a better shopper – we can deal with all the other regular relationship issues. : )